Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Raymond L. Nieves

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2017No. 2014AP001623-CRPublished

1Dissent

¶ 70.

ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J.

{dissenting). In no uncertain terms, the legislature enacted a statute mandating that a judge "shall grant a severance" where statements of one defendant will implicate the other in the crime charged:

The district attorney shall advise thé court prior to trial if the district attorney intends to use the statement of a codefendant which implicates another defendant in the crime charged. Thereupon, the judge shall grant a severance as to any such defendant.

Wis. Stat. § 971.12(3) (emphasis added).

¶ 71. This language is not confusing. It does not suggest multiple meanings…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Cruz v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API