State v. Raymond L. Nieves
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Dissent
¶ 70.
ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J.
{dissenting). In no uncertain terms, the legislature enacted a statute mandating that a judge "shall grant a severance" where statements of one defendant will implicate the other in the crime charged:
The district attorney shall advise thé court prior to trial if the district attorney intends to use the statement of a codefendant which implicates another defendant in the crime charged. Thereupon, the judge shall grant a severance as to any such defendant.
Wis. Stat. § 971.12(3) (emphasis added).
¶ 71. This language is not confusing. It does not suggest multiple meanings…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Cruz v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.