Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 29, 1926No. 11,449PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

The industrial commission denied compensation to Ida May Vaughn for the death of her husband; the district court affirmed the commission and she brings the case here.

The finding of the commission was that at his death she was voluntarily living apart from him and not dependent on him for support, which, if true, precludes her claim. C. L. § 4426.

The rule is that only dependents can receive compensation. C. L. § 4428, S. L. 1923, p. 724, § 2; but a wife is conclusively presumed to be dependent unless-at the time of death she is voluntarily living apart and independent. C. L. § 4426; London,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Armour & Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  2. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Vanadium Corporation of America v. SargentSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. McBride v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  3. Williams v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  4. Game and Fish Department v. PardoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. Industrial Commission v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API