Legal Opinion

Ward v. Clayton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 18, 1969No. 693SC129PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

Appellant’s only assignment of error is the signing and entering of the judgment sustaining the Commissioner of Revenue and dismissing the action.

G.S. 105-147 entitled “Deductions” provides:

“In computing net income there shall be allowed as deductions the following items: ... (9) Losses of such nature as designated below: . . . b. Losses of property not connected with a trade or business sustained in the income year if arising from fire, storm, shipwreck or other casualties or theft to the extent such losses are not compensated for by insurance or otherwise;”.

Unquestionably the statute…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lucas v. American Code Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Burnet v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Helvering v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. United States v. FlannerySupreme Court of the United States · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc. v. HintonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Aronov v. Secretary of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Midrex Corp. v. LynchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Sloop v. FribergCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Sloop v. FribergCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API