Bantam Books, Inc. v. Melko
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
By the voluntary acts of the plaintiff by submission to conferences before suit, the object of its suit was reduced to restoration of a single publication of the plaintiff, namely, The Chinese Room, to circulation. The defendant prosecutor’s defenses were all related by him to laws of this State prohibiting and penalizing the advertising, offering for sale and selling of obscene matter. The Superior Court, Chancery Division, having found that the book in question was not criminally obscene, all other issues were rendered moot. This ordinarily would require dismissal here, inasmuch as the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bantam Books, Inc. v. MelkoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Aday v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. Hudson County News Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Hudson County News Co. v. SillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- State v. KohlerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.