Legal Opinion

State v. Schilz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 4, 1978No. A 77-12-18414, CA 10746PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

This is a proceeding under the Habitual Traffic Offender Act, ORS 484.700 to 484.750. On December 27, 1977, a complaint to declare defendant a habitual traffic offender was filed by the district attorney in Multnomah County Circuit Court. The state appeals from an order of the trial court dismissing the complaint on the ground that:

"* * * [j]n thg absence of actual notice to defendant, notification of the warning letter pursuant to ORS 482.715 must be by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressee only, regardless [of] whether the letter was mailed before or after July 1, 1976.”

On May…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. State v. BuenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. Brooke v. BosleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  4. State v. CarlileCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. State ex rel. Robinett v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API