Legal Opinion

State v. Carlile

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 12, 1977No. 76-11-26, CA 8148PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

This is an appeal by the state from an order that dismissed its complaint against defendant under the Habitual Traffic Offenders Act, ORS 484.700 et seq, on the ground that the Motor Vehicles Division had failed to adequately "notify the licensee” as required by ORS 484.715. The question is what does "notify” mean in ORS 484.715.

Notification is required when another conviction will expose a licensee to possible revocation as a habitual offender. The Motor Vehicles Division sent such a statement to defendant by registered mail to the last address defendant had given the Division. For reasons…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DennisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. State v. SchilzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. State ex rel. Motor Vehicles Division v. ConforthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API