Loveland v. Collins
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Smith, J., Richland, Summer term, 1917. Action by Theodore O. Loveland and others doing business as Brenard Manufacturing Company against N. H. Collins. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal.
Read the full summary
Before Smith, J., Richland, Summer term, 1917. Action by Theodore O. Loveland and others doing business as Brenard Manufacturing Company against N. H. Collins. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed on entry of remittitur; otherwise reversed. submits: The negotiable law is inapplicable: LXXVIII Stats. 668-696.' As to charge on facts: State Constitution, art. V, sec. 26; 81 S. C. 546, 552; 91 S. C. 202; 105 S. C. 55. As to construction of contract: 14 S. C. 162-165; 78 S. C. 5; 81 $. C. 226; 102 S. C. 227, 242; 104 S. C. 378. Verdict was wholly unsupported by evidence: 101 S.…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Hydrick.
On February 17, 1914, defendant, who is a merchant gave plaintiffs the following order for an advertising proposition :
“Gentlemen: On your approval of this order, deliver to me at your earliest convenience, f. o. b. factory or distributing point, the de luxe grafanola, sewing machine, watches, silverware and advertising matter described on this and reverse side, in payment for which I agree to pay you $400 as per terms stated below. My last twelve months sales were $26,000. My next twelve months sales to be $32,000, and if 1J4 per…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Hallman v. CushmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941