Legal Opinion

State v. Eberly

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2006No. S-05-1008PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

While the appellant, Grant Eberly, was away from his home, police were dispatched there to investigate a burglary call. Police entered the home and found a marijuana-growing operation. After obtaining a search warrant, they seized the contraband. Eberly moved to suppress the evidence, but the court found the emergency doctrine justified the warrantless entry. Eberly appeals, arguing that the officers’ initial entry violated the Fourth Amendment and its Nebraska equivalent; thus, that information was improperly included in the search warrant affidavit and the evidence seized from the home was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. MeeksTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. DraganescuNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. AuNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. PerryNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Williams v. BairdNebraska Supreme Court · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API