Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Richardson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1996PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the Tennessee savings statute 1 applies to save an action which was initially filed within the one-year products liability statute of limitations and the products liability statute of repose 2 , but which was voluntarily dismissed and refiled beyond the six-year statute of repose. We hold that it does. The Court of Appeals’ judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court.

BACKGROUND

For purposes of this appeal, the facts are not disputed. On May 24,1984, plaintiff Ray Sharp sustained multiple injuries in an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cronin v. HoweTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Wilson v. Johnson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Jenkins v. Loudon CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. BoltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Dukes v. Montgomery County Nursing HomeTennessee Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Penley v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Estate of Ardell Hamilton TriggTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Amanda Elliott v. R. Michael CobbTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Hong Samouth (Sam) Rajvongs v. Dr. Anthony WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  5. McCullough v. Johnson City Emergency Physicians, P.C.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API