Legal Opinion
Hughes v. Welsbach Electric Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 5, 2012Published
1Opinion of the Court
*685“A motion for leave to renew shall be based upon new facts not offered on the prior motion that would change the prior determination, and shall contain reasonable justification for the failure to present such facts on the prior motion” (Marrero v Crystal Nails, 77 AD3d 798, 799 [2010]; see CPLR 2221 [e]; Behar v Quaker Ridge Golf Club, Inc., 95 AD3d 808, 809 [2012]; Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP v Albert, 78 AD3d 985, 986 [2010]). Here, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for leave to renew her opposition to the defendants’ motion for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Grossman v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. v. MarcheseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Marrero v. Crystal NailsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP v. AlbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Behar v. Quaker Ridge Golf Club, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012