Legal Opinion
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Rubenfeld
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided January 4, 1974PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner Mobil Oil Corporation brings this summary holdover proceeding to recover possession of a gasoline station from the respondent dealer, pursuant to a contractual option to terminate the lease and retail dealer agreement. Respondent alleges, as an affirmative defense,, inter alia, that the petitioner sought to fix and control the retail price of gasoline through means of coercion, which took the form of threatened cancellation of ,his lease. At the trial, respondent raised the additional issue that he was coerced by means of comparable threats, into purchasing tires, batteries and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Paul Lessig v. Tidewater Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Yvonne C. Edwards v. Nathan HabibCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Dr. Finn F. L'Orange v. The Medical Protective CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Joseph M. MargiottaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Robert ChestmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Penato v. GeorgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Don King Productions, Inc. v. DouglasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. ReedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.