Legal Opinion

Burlington Building & Loan Ass'n v. Cummings

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 7, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, C. J.

As amended this petition was brought for the purpose of having two certain mortgages, each covering a sepa rate parcel of land, in the City of Burlington, adjudged valid and foreclosed. The defendant Vilas is the only contestant and is hereinafter referred to as the defendant. The Chancellor adjudged the mortgages valid and entered a decree of foreclosure, computing the amount due on the mortgage debt as of November 10, 1938, from which the defendant appealed, the only issue raised by him being the validity of the mortgages. After the appeal was heard in this Court the decree was affirmed,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. StacySupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  2. Burlington Building & Loan Ass'n v. CummingsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  3. Houghton v. CookSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  4. Seaver v. DurantSupreme Court of Vermont · 1866
  5. Chapman v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1837

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. L. Paul Dieffenbach, Jr. v. Attorney General of Vermont, Hazel M. Stevenson, Robert B. Young, First National Bank of Orwell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  2. Aldrich v. LINCOLN LAND CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
  3. Miele v. MieleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  4. Fox v. Bohemian Savings & Loan Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API