Legal Opinion

L. Paul Dieffenbach, Jr. v. Attorney General of Vermont, Hazel M. Stevenson, Robert B. Young, First National Bank of Orwell, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 8, 1979No. 902, Docket 78-7507PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKES, Circuit Judge:

Appellant pro se challenges on equal protection and due process grounds the so-called “strict foreclosure” laws of the state of Vermont under which on foreclosure of a real estate mortgage the mortgagee owns the mortgaged property absolutely and need not apply the proceeds of any sale in satisfaction of the mortgage debt. Appellant also seeks to challenge on constitutional grounds a Vermont statute, 12 Vt.Stat. Ann. § 4601, 1 which provides that a defendant (but not a plaintiff) in a foreclosure action needs leave of court to appeal. And he also claims a violation of his…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Rogin v. Bensalem TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. Rodriguez v. WeprinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. Rodriguez v. WeprinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  4. Texaco Inc. v. Pennzoil Company, State of Texas, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  5. New York State Trawlers Ass'n v. JorlingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API