Legal Opinion
Vance v. Department of Retirement Systems
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 17, 2002No. 20656-4-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
Mary Vance suffered several back injuries, one of which was caused on the job. She received nonduty disability benefits from the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) and duty-related disability benefits from the Department of Labor and Industries (L&I). The Department of Retirement Systems (DRS) determined that her PERS benefit should be offset by her L&I benefit pursuant to RCW 41.40.300. Ms. Vance appealed to the superior court. Finding no offset was required, the court reversed the DRS decision. DRS appeals. We reverse and reinstate the DRS decision.
FACTS
Ms. Vance became a member of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fray ex rel. Fray v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. ArguetaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- One Pacific Towers Homeowners' Ass'n v. HAL Real Estate Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- One Pacific Towers Homeowners'ass'n v. Hal Real Estate Inv.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Fray v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Olympia v. DrebickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- City of Olympia v. DrebickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004