Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 25, 1981No. A2582PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL PRESSLER, Justice.

This is an appeal from a take-nothing judgment in a garnishment proceeding. Appellant sought to garnish insurance policies issued by Appellees, the primary and excess insurers of Timmers Chevrolet, Inc. (hereinafter Timmers), in an effort to satisfy the unpaid portion of a judgment previously obtained against Timmers and other defendants. The judgment was for injuries sustained in a collision with a wrecker. In that suit the jury found that Timmers conspired with the other defendants to evade the auto wrecker permit laws of the City of Pasadena and that Timmers was an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Western Reserve Life Insurance v. MeadowsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Carroll v. Timmers Chevrolet, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. General American Indemnity Company v. PepperTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  4. National Mutual Casualty Co. v. LoweryTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Pritchett v. Highway Insurance UnderwritersTexas Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Howard v. Ina County Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
  2. Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Safe Tire Disposal Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  3. Sung Wan Jun v. Lloyds & Other Various Insurers, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  4. Scottsdale Insurance v. SessionsDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2003
  5. Howard v. Ina County Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API