Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Carr v. Hill

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 29, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00074Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ARQUINCY LEE CARR, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 24-CV-74-JPS DAVID ZOERNER, RYAN HILL, D. NAEF, LASHONDA GRAY, and N. ORDER ZIMMERMAN, Defendants. Plaintiff ArQuincy Lee Carr, an inmate confined at Kenosha County Detention Center (“KCDC”), filed a pro se complaint under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

alleging that Defendants violated his constitutional rights. ECF No. 1. This Order resolves Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee and screens his complaint. 1. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING THE FILING FEE The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API