Legal Opinion

Institute for Fisheries Resources v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 10, 2024No. 3:23-cv-05748Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES Case No. 3:23-cv-05748-JD RESOURCES, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE STAY 9 v. 10 CONTINENTAL TIRE THE AMERICAS, 11 LLC, et al., Defendants. 12 13 The crux of this environmental case is whether the use of N-(1,3-dimethylbutyl)-N’- 14 phenyl-p-phenylenediamine (6PPD) in car and truck tires made by defendants resulted in road 15 runoff in the form of 6PPD-quinone (6PPD-q) that caused a “taking” of protected salmonid fish 16 species in West Coast populations under Section 9 of the Endangered Species…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Skye Astiana v. the Hain Celestial GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen v. Jewel Tea Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Arizona Cattle Growers' Ass'n v. United States Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API