Legal Opinion

Velez v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 13, 1991No. 90-AB-860-A; CA A65272PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Claimant seeks review of an Employment Appeals Board order that determined that she was ineligible for unemployment benefits because she was discharged from her employment for wilful misconduct. ORS 657.176(2)(a). We affirm.

EAB found, in part:

“(2) The employer did not allow its employees to quarrel or fight while on company property. (3) Claimant [petitioner] knew of and understood the policy.
“(4) On December 19, 1989, claimant told a co-worker that the co-worker’s husband was dumb. * * * (6) The co-worker grabbed claimant’s arm and claimant told her to stop. (7) Claimant walked away. (8) The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bunnell v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Halling v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. Halling v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Johnson v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Johnson v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API