Legal Opinion
GUTIERREZ
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1977No. ID 2587PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #2587 MATTBR OF GU'lltalRE In Deportation Proceedings A-31404629 Decided by Board May 26, 1977 (1) Where the record showed that the immigration judge took scrupulous care to inform respondent of his right to be represented by counsel and old the availability of Legal Aid counsel at no charge to respondent and the immigration judge offered to adjourn the hearing to enable respondent to obtain counsel but respondent nonetheless desired to go ahead with the hearing, the respondent was sufficiently informed of his right to be represented by counsel at the hearing in compliance…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bridges v. WixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Djordje Kovac v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, John P. Boyd, District Director, Seattle, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Zakonaite v. WolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Jesus Aguilera-Enriquez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Jose Dias De Souza v. Bruce G. Barber, Director of Immigration and NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rafael Montilla v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- SANTOSBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1984
- GARCIA-GARROCHOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1986
- United States v. HindsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1992
- Rafael Montilla v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.