Legal Opinion

Fisher Body Co. v. Wade

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLloyd, J.

Marie E. Wade, plaintiff in the Court of common pleas, applied to the Industrial Commission of Ohio for compensation for the death of her husband, Wilbur E. Wade, and the commission denying her right to participate in the state insurance fund she appealed to the court of common pleas, where, a jury being waived, a finding and final order was entered in her favor against the Fisher Body Company, plaintiff in error, which under the Workmen’s Com pensation Act was a self-insurer. For brevity we will refer to tbe plaintiff in error as Fisher and to the dedendant in error as plaintiff. By these…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith Bros., Inc. v. O'BryanTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Dahnke v. MeggittOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Keefer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Taylor v. SeneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Industrial Commission v. ArnoldOhio Court of Appeals · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API