McBride v. Hicklin
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Vigo Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appellant, acting in his official capacity of supervisor, took up and impounded thirty-eight sheep belonging to the appellee, and he brought this action to recover for feeding and caring for them. The second paragraph of the answer alleges that the animals escaped from the enclosure of the appellee late in the night, and that early the next morning he hunted for and found them.
Conceding, but not deciding, that a supervisor who takes up animals found running at large, may recover the compensation provided by the statute (sections 2637, 2643, R. S. 1881,) in a personal action against the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Davis v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Jones v. ClouserIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. FennIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- State Exchange Bank v. PaulIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Briscoe v. AlfreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
- Gilbert v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Wolf v. NicholsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.