Legal Opinion

Riley v. Mutual Life Ins.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 1, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Before Klugh, J., Saluda, May term-. 1903. Action by D. Luther Riley against Mutual Life Insurance Co. From order of Circuit Court remanding the cause to magistrate court, defendant appeals. cites: Summons served does not give Court jurisdiction of defendant: Rev. Stat., sec. 88, sub-div. 16; 26 S. E. R-, 985; 27 S. E. R., 526.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Ci-iiee Justice Pope.

The plaintiff instituted his action in the court of M. L. Little, Esq., one of the magistrates for Saluda County, on the 3d day of April, 1903, to recover the sum of $26.50 of the said defendant, the Mutual Life Insurance Company. The summons was served upon E. H. Hyatt, Esq., as manager for this State of said defendant insurance company, on the 7th day of April, 1903, at Columbia, S. C., and said summons is in these words:

“State of South Carolina, County of Saluda, Court of Magistracy. Summons for relief, complaint served. D.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wren v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown Parler v. KolbSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  2. Turner v. HarrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API