Legal Opinion

Croskey v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 22, 2000No. 98-650PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order quashing an execution sale sought by Morris Eckhart, a junior lien holder inadvertently omitted from a foreclosure action. The district court, without elaboration, limited Eckhart’s relief to equitable rights of redemption. Eckhart claims the court’s ruling deprives him of due process under Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Pope, 485 U.S. 478, 108 S.Ct. 1340, 99 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988).

We conclude that, because the court’s order quashing the sale nevertheless preserved Eckhart’s redemption rights as a junior lien holder under Iowa Code…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Baldi v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Albee v. CurtisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  5. Wright v. LeclaireSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MillerMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Great Western Bank v. ClementCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2019
  3. Great Western Bank v. ClementSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021
  4. Jeanette Page v. Ann H. MillerMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Rolling Hills Bank and Trust v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API