Welch Allyn, Inc. v. Vail Tool Co.

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly permitted the application of defendants’ attorney to withdraw to be made by cross motion rather than by order to show cause. Defendants’ and plaintiff’s counsel were aware of the application (see, CPLR 321 [b] [2]), were present during oral *825argument and did not object to the relief sought (see, Piercy v Piercy, 97 AD2d 972). Because defendants’ attorneys demonstrated sufficient cause, the court properly granted that application (see, Solomon v…