Legal Opinion
Solomon v. Solomon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 26, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Plaintiffs attorney’s motion to be relieved as plaintiffs attorney (CPLR 321 [b] [2]) should have been granted. In support of his motion, plaintiffs attorney asserted that plaintiff refused to pay disbursements in violation of their retainer agreement, and that he had warned her that he would so move if she did not pay them. He also asserted that plaintiff had failed to comply with his *1082requests that she complete certain necessary forms, including her net worth statement. Plaintiff failed to submit opposing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rosen v. RosenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Goldman v. Rafel Estates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Holmes v. Y.J.A. Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Dordal v. Laces Roller Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Galvano v. GalvanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Klagsbrun v. KlagsbrunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Matter of Patience T. (Christopher T.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Welch Allyn, Inc. v. Vail Tool Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995