Legal Opinion
Davis v. BD. COMMR'S. MONROE CTY.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 4, 1971No. 170A11PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, P. J.
This appe,al involves a judgment against plaintiff in favor only of the defendant Board of Commissioners as an entity and as individuals. The other named parties are nominal appellees only. The finding and judgment appealed from reads in part as follows:
“And now the Court hears argument of counsel upon said demurrer, and, being duly advised in the premises sustains said demurrer.
“And the plaintiff now fails and refuses to amend her complaint or plead further as to the said defendants, the Board of Commissioners of the County of Monroe, Indiana, George Duncan, William Moser and Phillip Rogers,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brinkman v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967
- Klepinger v. Bd. of Comm. Co. of MiamiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968
- Klepinger v. Board of Comm.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1968
- Snyder, Admx. v. MouserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Millspaugh v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hurst v. Board of Com'rs of Pulaski CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- County of LaPorte v. JamesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Gilmer v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Oak Shores Property Owners' Ass'n v. Noble County Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Hurst v. Board of Com'rs of Pulaski CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983