Legal Opinion
Saca v. Canas
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 10, 2010PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
George J. Silver, J.
In this action to recover for personal injuries allegedly sustained in a motor vehicle accident, defendants Ricardo Canas, Penske Truck Leasing Co., Limited Partnership, Penske Truck Leasing Corporation and Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc. (the Canas defendants) move pursuant to CPLR 3211 for an order dismissing the complaint of plaintiffs Jose Saca, also known as Jose Sacaabrego, and Patricia Saca (plaintiffs) on res judicata, judicial estoppel, General Obligations Law § 13-101 and statute of limitations grounds. In the alternative, defendants move to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Martin v. City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Gilberg v. BarbieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. PlevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Continental Holdings, Inc. v. Crown Holdings Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012