Legal Opinion

Continental Holdings, Inc. v. Crown Holdings Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 5, 2012No. 11-2203PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYE, Circuit Judge.

Continental Holdings, Inc. (“Continental”) sold its food and beverage metal can and can-end technology business to Crown Holdings, Inc. (“Crown”) via a stock purchase agreement (“SPA”) in March 1990. The parties disputed the extent of each other’s resultant liabilities, as defined by section 10.3(a)(iv) of the SPA — the indemnity provision — in concurrent binding arbitration and judicial proceedings. After the arbitrator issued a decision interpreting the provision at issue, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of Crown on issue preclusion grounds, dismissed…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. GiancontieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Breed v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Parker v. Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Buechel v. BainNew York Court of Appeals · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gary Hughes v. City of Cedar RapidsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  2. Blondell Mitchell v. Media ComCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  3. Gary Hughes v. City of Cedar RapidsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  4. SIEGEL v. GOLDSTEINDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Webb v. WaterlooDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API