Legal Opinion

Burroughs v. Southern Pacific Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action to recover damages for ■injury to person and property caused by a collision between an automobile driven by plaintiff and a locomotive owned and operated by the defendant Southern Pacific Company. The defendant Inman-Poulsen Lum ber Company maintained the spur track on which the locomotive was running. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case in chief the trial court allowed the motion of each of the defendants for a judgment of involuntary nonsuit. The plaintiff appeals.

The vital question is whether the plaintiff is guilty of contributory negligence ás a matter of law. Such…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Pokora v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. McNab v. United Railways, Etc., Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  4. Cathcart v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Kirby v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fish v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Cole v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Adair, Adm'x v. Valley Flying ServiceOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Carlson v. Southern Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1967
  5. Cole v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API