Legal Opinion

Daniel Dorado v. County of San Diego; City of San Diego; State of California

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 24, 2026No. 3:26-cv-00741Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL DORADO, Case No. 26-cv-0741-RSH-SBC CDCR #BN-7728, 12 ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO Plaintiff, 13 PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. AS BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) 14 AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION 15 WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; CITY OF FAILURE TO PAY FILING 16 SAN DIEGO; STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FEE REQUIRED BY 17 Defendants. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) 18 [ECF Nos. 2, 4] 19 20 Plaintiff Daniel Dorado, a prisoner at High Desert State Prison, is proceeding 21 without counsel in this civil rights action filed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Andrews v. CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Andrews v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Lomax v. Ortiz-MarquezSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  5. Purcell v. GonzalezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API