Legal Opinion

Keller v. Boatman's Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 4, 1989No. 4-89-0141PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Spitz

Plaintiff’s amended complaint alleged defendant breached statutory duties owed to plaintiff under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 26, par. 1 — 101 et seq.). Defendant argued section 13 — 205 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 110, par. 13 — 205) barred the complaint because it was not timely filed and did not relate back to an earlier complaint. These are the issues raised on appeal. We reverse the decision of the trial court for the reasons specified herein.

On August 14, 1980, Juici-Rich Products, Inc., a Springfield-based company…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Zeh v. WheelerIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Blakeslee's Storage Warehouses, Inc. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Mitchell v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Parmelee v. PriceIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Handtoffski v. Chicago Consolidated Traction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Steinberg v. DunsethAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. Blacke v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Metzger v. New Century Oil & Gas Supply Corp. Income & Development ProgramAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Blacke v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. Steinberg v. DunsethAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API