Legal Opinion

State v. Wallack

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 9, 1922PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Mahaska District Court. — D. W. Hamilton, Judge. Indictment charging murder in the first degree/ ' Conviction of murder in the second degree.. Defendant'• appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtArthur, J.

— Under the rules of practice in this court, it is the duty of counsel, in preparing of brief and argument, to prepare what is designated a “brief,” following the errors relied upon for a reversal, and such brief should contain, under a separate heading of each error relied on, separately numbered propositions or points, stated concisely, and without argument or elaboration, together with authorities relied on in support of them. Counsel for appellant have wholly disregarded this rule; and while we do not desiré to prejudice the rights of the accused by reason of this neglect on the part of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HastySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. State v. HunterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. State v. PenneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. State v. O'ConnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. State v. GraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. JacobySupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  2. United States v. EnloeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  3. State v. RandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  4. Scott v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. MaupinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API