In Re Suarez
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice MOSELEY.
In this petition for writ of mandamus, relators assert the trial court abused its discretion by signing an order requiring them to pay sanctions. They assert that the order is void because they are not parties to the proceedings below, and that they are entitled to mandamus relief because they have no adequate remedy at law. We agree that the trial court’s order for sanctions is void; thus, relators are entitled to relief without showing the absence of an adequate remedy at law. Accordingly, we conditionally grant the petition for writ of mandamus.
I. Factual…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Werner v. ColwellTexas Supreme Court · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In the Interest of H.M.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2011
- In Re Green Oaks Hospital Subsidiary, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
- In Re JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., D/B/A "Chase Bank" v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2026
- In Re Texas Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2025
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.