Legal Opinion
Heather Wanke v. Invasix Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided February 1, 2021No. 3:19-cv-00692Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION HEATHER WANKE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 3:19-cv-0692 ) Judge Aleta A. Trauger INVASIX INC. and INMODE LTD., ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM Defendants Invasix Inc. (“Invasix”) and InMode Ltd. (“InMode”) have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 93), to which Heather Wanke has filed a Response (Doc. No. 107), the defendants have filed a Reply (Doc. No. 112), Wanke has filed a Sur-Reply (Doc. No. 116), and the defendants have filed a Sur-Sur-Reply (Doc. No. 119). Wanke has filed a Motion to Strike…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.