Legal Opinion
O'Toole v. Department of Labor & Industries
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 1935No. 25573. Department OnePublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
The department has appealed from a judgment reversing the order of the joint board which order sustained the department in its rejection of a claim for a widow’s pension under the industrial insurance act.
The cause was tried to the court sitting without a jury. The trial court made findings from which we quote:
“That the plaintiff is the widow of Thomas O’Toole, deceased, and has no children under the age of sixteen years. . . .
“That on April 2nd, 1934, while he was employed and in the course of his employment and while engaged in extra-hazardous employment as aforesaid, Thomas O’Toole, in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Metcalf v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Kavaja v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Zoff v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Smith v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Rikstad v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- McCormick Lumber Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Riley v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
- In Re JullinWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Matson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Spino v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.