Legal Opinion

O'Toole v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1935No. 25573. Department OnePublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

The department has appealed from a judgment reversing the order of the joint board which order sustained the department in its rejection of a claim for a widow’s pension under the industrial insurance act.

The cause was tried to the court sitting without a jury. The trial court made findings from which we quote:

“That the plaintiff is the widow of Thomas O’Toole, deceased, and has no children under the age of sixteen years. . . .
“That on April 2nd, 1934, while he was employed and in the course of his employment and while engaged in extra-hazardous employment as aforesaid, Thomas O’Toole, in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Kavaja v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Zoff v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Smith v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Rikstad v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McCormick Lumber Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Riley v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. In Re JullinWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Matson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Spino v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API