Legal Opinion

Cato v. Jeffreys

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 18, 1932No. 3819PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

Appellants brought suit against appellee as indorser on five promissory notes. Each of these notes contains the following clause: “We, the makers, sureties, guarantors and

endorsers severally waive presentment for payment, protest and notice of protest and non-payment of this note.”

■ Appellants’ second amended original petition sets out these notes in hsec verba, and in addition they specially pleaded that presentment for payment and protest had been expressly waived by defendant. During the trial of the case, appellants offered to prove the cause of action pleaded by the introduction of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sowell v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Sydnor v. GascoigneTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Wardlaw v. Farmers' & Merchants' Bank Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Commercial Nat. Bank v. SandersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whalen v. EtheridgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Interstate Life Insurance Company v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. National State Bank v. Miles-Botts Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API