Legal Opinion
Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc. v. Microgenesys, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 15, 1991No. 91 Civ. 2060 (SWK)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
In this action involving a claim on a subordinated convertible bridge note, defendants have moved, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for an order dismissing plaintiffs first, second and third claims based on § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and § 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. In addition, defendants have moved to dismiss plaintiffs fourth, fifth and sixth claims on the ground that there is no independent basis for federal jurisdiction over these common law claims.
BACKGROUND 1
In…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cooper v. PateSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,590 David Segal v. Lawrence Gordon, and Coburn Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Lawrence M. Powers v. British Vita, P.L.C., Rodney H. Sellers, and Francis J. EatonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Kubin v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Maywalt v. Parker & Parsley Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Neubauer v. Eva-Health USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.