Pilgrim v. City of Winona
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, Justice.
This is an appeal from a district court judgment finding Winona Zoning Ordinance No. 2138 null and void. The action was commenced by the Pilgrims, who are landholders in the Hillview Subdivision of Winona. They originally sought three forms of relief: (1) A declaration that Ordinance No. 2138 was null and void; (2) an injunction restraining the city of Winona from doing anything with respect to the Hillview Subdivision inconsistent with its being zoned R-l; and (3) an order that the city alter all maps and documents to show that Hillview was zoned R-l. The district court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Brelsford v. Retirement Board of Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- District of Columbia v. JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Village of River Forest v. Midwest Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Lane-Moore Lumber Co. v. City of Storm LakeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
3Cited by7 opinions
- Glen Paul Court Neighborhood Ass'n v. PasterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- County of Ramsey v. StevensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Pennington County v. MooreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Di Ma Corp. v. City of St. CloudCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Rowell v. Board of Adjustment of City of MoorheadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.