Legal Opinion

Pennington County v. Moore

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1994No. 18657PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice.

Appellant Pennington County (County) appeals the trial court’s ruling that zoning ordinances enacted by County since 1970 are invalid and unenforceable due to the absence of a properly enacted comprehensive zoning plan. We affirm.

FACTS

In 1979 and 1980, Appellee Francis Moore purchased two parcels of real estate totaling approximately twenty acres. He began operating a salvage yard for motor vehicles on the property. In 1986, Francis transferred title of the tract to his son, Appellee Russell Moore. Russell continues to use the land as a salvage yard.

In July 1991, County…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. County Council v. District Land Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Rusch v. KaukerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. A. J. Aberman, Inc. v. New KensingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Save Centennial Valley Ass'n, Inc. v. SchultzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Edwards v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Schafer v. DEUEL COUNTY BD. OF COM'RS.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Hawk v. Eldred Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Abata v. Pennington Cnty. Bd. of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Abata v. Pennington Cty. Bd. of Comm'rsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API