Legal Opinion

Nathu v. City Of Oakland

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 13, 2022No. 3:20-cv-05242Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 TULSEE NATHU, et al., Case No. 4:20-cv-05242-SBA (LB) 12 Plaintiffs, DISCOVERY ORDER 13 v. Re: ECF No. 70 14 CITY OF OAKLAND, 15 Defendant. 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 The plaintiffs — who are hotel developers — dispute the City of Oakland’s (the City’s) denial 19 of their application to build a hotel. In June 2018, the Oakland Planning Commission approved a 20 conditional-use permit to build the hotel, finding that the project complied with applicable 21 regulations, including Oakland…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. RicheyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. RuehleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. In the Matter of Elaine B. Fischel, Contemner-Appellant. United States of America v. Harry MargolisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Chevrontexoco Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API