Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Frenden

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1996No. 1995-2597Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 74 Ohio St.3d 601.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. FRENDEN. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Frenden,

1996-Ohio-251.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Six-month suspension—Conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. (No. 95-2597—Submitted January 24, 1996—Decided February 28, 1996.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 95-14. __________________ {¶ 1} In a complaint filed February 6, 1995, relator, Office of Disciplinary Counsel, charged respondent, John A.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FrendenOhio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API