Legal Opinion

Kimbrough v. Walker

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn R Tenney, J.

Plaintiff, James Kimbrough, in Action No. 1 and Joseph F. Works in Action No. 2 were operating their vehicles when they were involved in accidents with vehicles of the respective defendants. Both plaintiffs were operating uninsured vehicles in violation of title 3 of article 6 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law and were guilty of misdemeanors under section 319. Plaintiff, Minnie Kimbrough, was a passenger in her husband’s vehicle.

Defendants have moved to dismiss these actions because plaintiffs do not qualify. Under article XVIII of the Insurance Law, they do not satisfy the definition of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Riggs v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Scarpelli v. MarshallNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Marc-Charles v. KrugCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978
  3. Stark v. MillerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978
  4. Woodbine v. We Try Harder, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API