Legal Opinion
Patterson v. Loewenstein
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 22, 1997No. 95-4316PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
686 So.2d 776 (1997)
Harry PATTERSON, Appellant,
v.
Howard LOEWENSTEIN, Appellee.
No. 95-4316.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
January 22, 1997.
Thomas A. Conrad of Heller & Conrad, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.
Burney J. Carter of Burney J. Carter, P.A., Sebastian, for appellee.
WARNER, Judge.
The plaintiff/appellee filed a complaint within days before the statute of limitations expired. Because the appellee's attorney determined that additional investigation was necessary to determine whether appellee's claim was viable, he did not attempt to have the complaint served on…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shihshu Walter Wei v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Sheldon Lovelace v. Acme Markets, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Morales v. Sperry Rand Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Morales v. Sperry Rand Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Hodges v. NoelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Totura & Co., Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Stahl v. EvansDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Metz v. PaulDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Foster v. ChungDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Porolniczak v. ItkinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997