Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Minton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Pratt District Court. The opinion states the nature of the action, and the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

StraNG, C.:

Action on a promissory note. Martin Taylor and E. C. Minton were executors of the estate of Samuel Taylor, deceased. Minton did most of the business and handled the money, which he deposited in bis own name in a bank. Some time before the estate was settled, and the administration closed up, Taylor and Minton looked over Minton’s account as executor, and it was found that Min-ton had used for himself $120 of funds belonging to the estate. To make the amount good, he made his promissory note to Martin Taylor, his coexecutor, but made it to Taylor individually, instead of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Insley v. ShireSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  2. Moore v. PalmerWashington Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API