Legal Opinion
Ruggiero v. Krzeminski
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 18, 1991No. Nos. 600, 666 and 696, Dockets 89-9257, 90-7093 and 90-7515PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MINER, Circuit Judge:
Defendants-appellants Officers Krzemin-ski and Lemons (the “Officers”) appeal from a judgment for nominal damages and attorney’s fees entered in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Eginton, J.) following a jury trial in a civil rights action predicated on an illegal search and seizure conducted in the home of plaintiffs-appellees. Responding to special interrogatories submitted by the court, the jury found that there had been a consent to the entry of the premises and that the seizure of certain objects within the premises was permissible…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Anthony Romano v. Kenneth Howarth, Michael Juron and Matthew KarkosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Maureen Tierney, for Herself and as Mother of Philip T. Newton, Patrick J. Newton v. Joel R. Davidson Thomas E. Williams, State of VermontCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Figueroa v. Rivera-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Jermosen v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.