Legal Opinion

Bernard v. Huebel

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Demurrer to complaint for insufficiency and for lack of jurisdiction of the subject.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

The allegations disclose the defendant’s fraudulent attempt to obtain the benefit of the plaintiff’s invention through the use of information given him by the plaintiff, touching that invention, when employing him to construct a model, and it is made to appear that, with the knowledge thus obtained in confidence, and under a pledge of secrecy, the defendant asserted himself to be the- inventor, delayed the issuance of a patent to the plaintiff until 'after the termination of a lengthy contest, and enjoyed the profits derived from making and selling the article in the meantime.

Upon this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nilsson v. De HavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McNamara v. PowellNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Strelitzer v. SchnaierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API