Legal Opinion

Hayat ex rel. BTU Holdings Co v. Al-Mazeedi

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided January 11, 2011No. 081004Published

1Opinion of the Court

Billings, Thomas P., J.

For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Verified Complaint is ALLOWED in limited part, and otherwise DENIED.

FACTS

This is a dispute over the internal affairs of a corporation (defendant BTU Holdings), incorporated in the Cayman Islands, with three shareholders: the plaintiff Hayat, a citizen and resident of Kuwait, and the individual defendants Al-Mazeedi and Oishi, citizens of Kuwait and Japan (respectively) who reside in Lexington, Massachusetts. The company maintains a mailing address at its lawyers’ offices in George Town, Grand Cayman, but…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Bushkin Associates, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API