Legal Opinion
State v. Lopez
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 10, 1995No. C9-95-714, C0-95-715 and C2-95-716Published
1Opinion of the Court
538 N.W.2d 705 (1995)
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Linda R. LOPEZ (C9-95-714), Daniel J. Shekore (C0-95-715), Roger D. Albro (C2-95-716), Appellants.
Nos. C9-95-714, C0-95-715 and C2-95-716.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
October 10, 1995.
Thomas P. Martin, Assistant City Attorney, Moorhead, for Respondent.
Richard D. Varriano, Moorhead, for Appellants.
Considered and decided by NORTON, P.J., and RANDALL and DAVIES, JJ.
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
In this consolidated appeal from three separate DWI convictions, appellants challenge the trial court's denial of their motions to exclude evidence obtained…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. ScalesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.