Harris County Flood Control District v. Roberts
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.
A condemning authority asserts that the trial court erred in valuing a leasehold interest because, as a matter of law, a billboard sign structure erected on the condemned land was not a fixture that had become part of the realty at the time of the taking. Under the applicable standard of review, we conclude that the trial evidence in the bench trial is conflicting on this issue and that the condemning authority has not shown that, as a matter of law, the billboard sign structure in this case was not a fixture at the time of the taking. The condemning…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Catalina v. BlasdelTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Logan v. MullisTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Hirschfeld Steel Co. v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation District v. AdkissonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eun Bok Lee v. Ho Chang Lee, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
- State v. CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
- State v. Moore Outdoor Properties, LP and Arrington Outdoor of Fort Worth, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2013
- State v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.