Legal Opinion
State v. CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, INC.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided September 11, 2008No. 01-07-00353-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JANE BLAND, Justice.
The State of Texas appeals the denial of its plea to the jurisdiction in Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.’s claims for inverse condemnation and condemnation damages, contending that the facts alleged by Clear Channel fail to demonstrate that the State has waived sovereign immunity for those claims and, therefore, the trial court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over them. We affirm.
Background
In 2001, Clear Channel obtained a leasehold interest in a parcel of land, identified as parcel 709, located in Harris County within view of the Katy Freeway. Pursuant to the lease,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Harris County v. SykesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State of Texas v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Moore Outdoor Properties, LP and Arrington Outdoor of Fort Worth, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2013
- Poole v. West Hardin County Consolidated Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
- State v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
- the City of Crowley v. Doug Ray, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.